Salgado
Salgado v. Iqvia, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20203:18-cv-02785California10,802 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 CINDY SALGADO, Case No. 18-cv-2785-BAS-WVG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY
IQVIA, INC. and QUINTILES JUDGMENT; AND
COMMERCIAL US, INC., (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 [ECF Nos. 28, 29]
18 Presently before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment by Plaintiff Cindy Salgado and Defendants Quintiles Commercial U.S., Inc. and Iqvia Inc. (“Def. Mot.,” ECF No. 28, “Pl. Mot.,” ECF No. 29.) Both motions are opposed, (“Pl. Opp’n,” ECF No. 33, “Def. Opp’n,” ECF No. 34), and both have replies filed in support, (“Def. Reply,” ECF No. 39, “Pl. Reply,” ECF No. 37). The Court finds resolution of these Motions is suitable without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN…