Salgado

Salgado v. Iqvia, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20203:18-cv-02785California10,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CINDY SALGADO, Case No. 18-cv-2785-BAS-WVG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY

IQVIA, INC. and QUINTILES JUDGMENT; AND

COMMERCIAL US, INC., (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR PARTIAL Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 [ECF Nos. 28, 29]

18 Presently before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment by Plaintiff Cindy Salgado and Defendants Quintiles Commercial U.S., Inc. and Iqvia Inc. (“Def. Mot.,” ECF No. 28, “Pl. Mot.,” ECF No. 29.) Both motions are opposed, (“Pl. Opp’n,” ECF No. 33, “Def. Opp’n,” ECF No. 34), and both have replies filed in support, (“Def. Reply,” ECF No. 39, “Pl. Reply,” ECF No. 37). The Court finds resolution of these Motions is suitable without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.