Victaulic Company v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20203:17-cv-01006California2,908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTAULIC COMPANY, a New Jersey Case No.: 3:17-cv-01006-BEN-JLB Corporation,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, SIXTH EXTENSION OF TIME AND v. ORDERING SERVICE BY

ELECTRONIC MEANS

ALLIED RUBBER & GASKET CO.,

15 INC. d/b/a ARGCO, a California

Corporation; TAIZHOU REALFLEX [Doc. 18] PIPETEC CO., LTD, a Peoples’ Republic 17 of China Corporation, 18 Defendant.

20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Victaulic Company’s (“Victaulic” or “Plaintiff”) Motion for a Sixth Extension of Time to Serve Summons and Complaint on Defendant Taizhou Realflex Pipetec Co. Ltd. (“Realflex” or “Defendant”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed its Complaint for patent infringement against Defendant Realflex on May 16, 2017. (Doc. No. 1.) Realflex is a corporation existing under the laws of China, with its principal place of business in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, People’s 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.