Bennett

Bennett v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20203:19-cv-02131California7,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA BENNETT; and Case No.: 19-cv-2131-WQH-BLM

JAMES BENNETT,

ORDER

Plaintiffs, 13 v.

CIELO HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION, INC.; THE

JUDGE LAW FIRM—A LAW

CORPORATION; JAMES

JUDGE; DAVID MANGIKYAN;

and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 11) and the Motion to Set Aside Default (ECF No. 20) filed by Defendants Cielo Homeowner’s Association, Inc., The Judge Law Firm, James Judge, and David Mangikyan. I. BACKGROUND On November 6, 2019, Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants Cielo Homeowner’s Association, Inc. (“Cielo”), The Judge Law Firm (“TJLF”), TJLF attorney James Judge, TJLF attorney David Mangikyan, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive. (ECF No. 1). On November 27, 2019, Defendants filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.