Amparan

Amparan v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20203:18-cv-02522California3,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TED AMPARAN, Case No.: 18cv2522-BTM (WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v.

M. E. SPEARMAN, Warden, (1) ADOPTING IN PART AS Respondent. MODIFIED AND DECLINING TO

ADOPT IN PART THE FINDINGS

AND CONCLUSIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE;

(2) DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; and

(3) ISSUING A LIMITED

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

22 Petitioner Ted Amparan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) He challenges his San Diego County Superior Court convictions for eight felony counts involving kidnapping and sexual assault of six women, and his sentence of life in prison plus 75 years to life in prison plus 15 years in prison. (Id. at 1.) He claims the state appellate court’s decision denying his claims of insufficiency of the evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.