Jae Properties, Inc. v. Amtax Holdings 2001-XX, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20203:19-cv-02075California1,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAE PROPERTIES, INC., Case No.: 19cv2075-JAH-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION

v. FOR SHORT CONTINUANCE OF

DEADLINE TO COMPLETE

AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC,

SPECIFIED DEPOSITIONS AND

Defendant OTHER SCHEDULING DATES

_________________________________ [ECF No. 49]

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

18 19 Currently before the Court is the parties’ joint motion requesting that the Court continue the currently June 1, 2020 deadline by 30-45 days to complete certain specified depositions.1 ECF No. 49. The parties state that there is good cause for the continuance because of “the COVID-19 pandemic, the location of the witnesses, many of whom are third parties, the location of the attorneys, and travel and other restrictions imposed by the federal, state, and local governments.” Id. at 2. Specifically, the parties state that “most of

27 1 The parties also later state in their Joint Motion that they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.