Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20203:18-cv-00073California3,109 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIRHAWK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Case No. 18-cv-00073-MMA-AGS California Limited Liability Company,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION v. [Doc. No. 139] ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Airhawk International, LLC (“Airhawk”) brings this action against Defendant Ontel Products Corporation (“Ontel”) asserting claims of: (1) Trademark Infringement, in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1); (2) Common Law Trademark Infringement; (3) False Designation of Origin and False Description, in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and (4) Unfair Competition, in violation of California Business and Professions Code §§ 17000 et seq. and 17500 et seq. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. On January 2, 2020, the Court granted partial summary judgment for Ontel on the issue of Airhawk’s request for disgorgement of profits, finding that Airhawk “fail[ed]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.