Olguin

Olguin v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20203:20-cv-00759California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA OLGUIN, Case No.: 20cv759-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 3] 16 17 On April 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. In this action, Plaintiff is seeking review and reversal of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) that denied Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. ECF No. 1. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if she is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.