Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18cv361-JLS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

RECONSIDERATION

Defendants. [ECF No. 136] 14 15 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Re-request of His Motion for Indefinite Postponement of Deposition [ECF No. 136] and Plaintiff’s Supporting Evidence for his Re-request to Postpone his Deposition Indefinitely [ECF No. 140]. The Court construes the two documents together as Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s April 23, 2020 Order (1) Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Indefinite Postponement of Deposition and (2) Resetting Deposition Date and Fact Discovery Cut-off [ECF No. 116]. Plaintiff argues that his deposition should be indefinitely postponed because “contrary to defendants [sic] statements (ECF No. 123),” Plaintiff requested his legal 25 …