Godfrey

Godfrey v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20203:20-cv-00917California725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK CHARLES GODFREY, Case No.: 20-CV-917-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, [Doc. No. 2.] Defendant. 16

18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds that the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief and GRANTS the IFP motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.