Buckelew
Buckelew v. Gore
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION SCOTT BUCKELEW, Case No.: 20cv0835 BAS (AGS)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSNG CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
SHERIFF WILLIAM D. GORE, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner Dion Scott Buckelew, proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not moved to proceed in forma pauperis. A Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus must either be accompanied by a $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See Local Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM ON HABEAS CORPUS Upon review of the Petition, it appears to the Court that a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus brought pursuant to § 2254 is not the proper vehicle for the claims Petitioner presents. Petitioner lists…