Carillo

Carillo v. FCA US LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20203:20-cv-00138California2,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 DIANA CARILLO, Case No.: 20-cv-0138 W (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND [DOC. 8];

FCA US LLC, et al.,

AND

Defendants. (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. 10.]

19 Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA”) removed this action from the San Diego Superior Court on January 21, 2020. (See Notice of Removal [Doc. 1-1].) Following the addition of a diversity destroying defendant in its first amended complaint (“FAC”), Plaintiff now moves to remand. (Mot. to Remand [Doc. 8].) Defendants move to strike the FAC. (Mot. to Strike [Doc. 10].) The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand [Doc. 8] and DENIES Defendants’ motion to strike the FAC [Doc. 10]. 1 I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.