Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20203:17-cv-01436California5,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, et al., Case No.: 17cv1436-GPC (MSB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: WILLIAMS & COCHRANE

v. AND ROSETTE DEFENDANTS’ JOINT

MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF

QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT YUMA

DISCOVERY DISPUTE [ECF NO. 297]

INDIAN RESERVATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 AND ALL RELATED COUNTER CLAIMS 18 On May 5, 2020, Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane, LLP (“W&C” or “Plaintiff”) and Defendant and Counter Claimant the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation (“the Tribe”) filed a joint motion to address W&C’s dissatisfaction with the Tribe’s objections and responses to W&C’s second set of interrogatories. (ECF No. 297.) The Court finds this motion suitable for resolution on the pleadings and without oral argument. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). I. LEGAL STANDARD The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize parties to obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.