Sekerke

Sekerke v. Leo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20203:19-cv-00034California1,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-GPC-RBB Booking No. 18165284,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY vs. RESTRAINING ORDER AND

INJUNCTION

15 ARTURO LEON; MARK O’BRIEN; [ECF No. 77]

JON MONTGOMERY; DANE OLSEN

and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. ECF No. 77 (“Mot.”). No oppositions or replies have been filed. The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. On January 7, 2019, Plaintiff proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this lawsuit. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in San Diego County Jail as a pretrial detainee. On February 10, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 53. In the SAC, Plaintiff argues that his right to medical care has been violated due to Defendants’ policy of refusing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.