Alexander

Alexander v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20203:20-cv-00100California4,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANAND JON ALEXANDER, Case No.: 20cv100-CAB-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 6] RALPH DIAZ, Defendant. 16 On January 14, 2020, Plaintiff Anand Jon Alexander filed a Complaint for Damages, setting forth six causes of action: (1) Eighth Amendment claim (under 42 U.S.C. §1983) for failure to protect inmate from harm; (2) Supervisory liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983; (3) Eighth Amendment claim (under 42 U.S.C. §1983) for deliberate indifference to medical condition; (4) Violation of California Civil Code §52.1 (Bane Act); (5) Negligence; and (6) Violation of California Government Code §845.6 (failure to summon or provide immediate necessary care). On March 30, 2020, Defendants Diaz, Pollard, Paramo and Ramirez filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. [Doc. No. 6.] On April 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 8.] On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.