Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20203:20-cv-00321California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-321 JLS (KSC) individual,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

Plaintiff, PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AS PREMATURE

HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE a Utah limited liability company; CHRIS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56(d) HOWELL, an individual; and JUSTIN

SPENCER, an individual, (ECF Nos. 34, 35) Defendants.

19 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Ex Parte Motions for Summary Judgment to Obtain Judgment for Invoices Due Pursuant to Second Agreement Section 9(a)(b) and Interest Due for Late Payment as per 9(c) (ECF No. 34) and for Invoices Due Pursuant to Second Agreement Section 8(a) and Interest Due for Late Payment as per 8(b) and Adjustments as per 8(d) (ECF No. 35) (together, “Pl.’s MSJs”). “Although Rule 56 allows a party to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.