Schooler

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schooler

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20203:12-cv-02164California2,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:12-cv-2164-GPC-JMA

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING

Plaintiff, (1) RECEIVER’S THIRTIETH v. INTERIM FEE APPLICATION; 14 [ECF No. 1758] LOUIS V. SCHOOLER and FIRST

FINANCIAL PLANNING

(2) ALLEN MATKINS’ CORPORATION dba Western

THIRTIETH INTERIM FEE

Financial Planning Corporation, APPLICATION; AND Defendant. [ECF No. 1759]

(3) DUFFY, KRUSPODIN, LLP’S

ELEVENTH INTERIM FEE

APPLICATION

[ECF No. 1760]

22 Before the Court are fee applications filed by the court-appointed receiver 23 Thomas C. Hebrank (the “Receiver”), counsel to the Receiver, Allen Matkins Leck 24 Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (“Allen Matkins”), and tax accountants to the 25 Receiver, Duffy, Kruspodin LLP (“Duffy”). ECF Nos. 1758, 1759, 1760. No 26 oppositions have been filed. The Court finds these motions suitable for disposition 27 without oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.