Nielsen

County of San Diego v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20203:19-cv-00631California6,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Case No.: 3:19cv0631-L-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, et al, Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). [ECF NO. 8.] Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant replied. The matter is submitted on the briefs without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff County of San Diego (“County” or “Plaintiff”) filed this action against Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Ronald D. Vitiello, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing Duties as Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director; Matthew T. Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Executive Associate Director; Kevin McAleenan,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.