Villa

Villa v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20203:20-cv-00537California3,751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MIGUEL VILLA, Case No.: 20-CV-537-CAB-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S

MOTION TO DISMISS WITH

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and RUDY

LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING

PERAZA,

DEFENDANT RUDY PERAZA’S Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS

18 [Doc. Nos. 6, 7] 19 Before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s and Defendant Rudy Peraza’s motions to dismiss. [Doc. Nos. 6, 7.] The Court finds them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant County of San Diego’s motion to dismiss is granted with leave to amend and Defendant Rudy Peraza’s motion to dismiss is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Miguel Villa alleges that on March 14, 2019, he was brought into the San Diego Central Jail for booking where Defendant Deputy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.