Villa
Villa v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MIGUEL VILLA, Case No.: 20-CV-537-CAB-NLS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and RUDY
LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING
PERAZA,
DEFENDANT RUDY PERAZA’S Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS
18 [Doc. Nos. 6, 7] 19 Before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s and Defendant Rudy Peraza’s motions to dismiss. [Doc. Nos. 6, 7.] The Court finds them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant County of San Diego’s motion to dismiss is granted with leave to amend and Defendant Rudy Peraza’s motion to dismiss is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Miguel Villa alleges that on March 14, 2019, he was brought into the San Diego Central Jail for booking where Defendant Deputy…