Appel
Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HOWARD APPEL, et al., Case No. 18-cv-873-BAS-MDD
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS THIRD AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT
BOSTON NATIONAL TITLE [ECF No. 101]
AGENCY, LLC,
15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant Boston National Title Agency, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 101.) Plaintiffs Howard Appel, David Cohen, and Ke’e Partners LLC filed an opposition to the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 102), to which Defendant replied, (“Reply,” ECF No. 103). The Court finds resolution of this matter is suitable without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Boston National’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND In June 2017, Plaintiffs signed a Bidder Registration Agreement with Concierge Auctions, LLC, to participate in Concierge’s “Summer Portfolio Sale” services would be provided…