Hudlow

Hudlow v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20203:18-cv-02826California6,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMES HUDLOW, Case No.: 18-cv-2826-CAB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; DEPUTY

ANTHONY MEHALIK; DEPUTY

CARLOS ESQUER,

15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 26] 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Deputy Carlos Esquer’s and Deputy Anthony Mehalik’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment. [Doc. No. 26.] The Court finds it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that on September 25, 2016 at 4: a.m., he was walking on Encinitas Boulevard towards his residence when he noticed a vehicle on the other side of the road. [Doc. No. 1, SAC at ¶ 12.1] Plaintiff alleges that deputies saw him walking and 26 27 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.