Moran
Moran v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFONSO and ARLENE MORAN, Case No.: 3:17-cv-02594-GPC-AHG individually and on behalf of a class of AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER similarly situated individuals,
AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT
13 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 14 v.
15 [ECF No. 70]
FCA US LLC,
17 Defendant.
19 On May 29, 2020, the parties filed a joint motion seeking a 90-day extension of the 20 remaining Scheduling Order deadlines in this case. ECF No. 70. 21 The Court may modify the scheduling order only for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 16(b)(4). In determining whether the parties have met the “good cause” standard, the Court 23 primarily considers their diligence in conducting discovery thus far. Johnson v. Mammoth 24 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). That is, the Court may modify the 25 pretrial schedule “if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking 26 the extension.” Id. (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. advisory committee’s notes (1983 27 amendment)). 28 This is…