Arellano

Arellano v. Sedighi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20203:15-cv-02059California1,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 15-CV-2059-AJB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. RECONSIDER DR. SEDIGHI, R. WALKER, Chief Physician and Surgeon, S. ROBERTS, 15 M.D., Chief Medical Executive, et al.,

Defendants.

17 (Doc. No. 65) 18 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 65.) As will be explained in greater detail, below the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Skomal issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Dr. Sedighi’s motion to dismiss, grant without leave to amend Defendants Walker, Roberts, Lewis, and Glynn’s motion to dismiss, deny Nurse Busalacchi’s motion to dismiss, and deny Plaintiff’s motion to disclose the name of Doe #1. (Doc. No. 43.) On March 20, 2018, the Court adopted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.