Saul

De La Tova v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20203:20-cv-01055California1,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELICA YANNETTE DE LA TOVA, Case No.: 20cv1055-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS;

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, [ECF No. 3] Defendant.

17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Angelica Yannette de la Tova’s complaint seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s decision and accompanying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1,3. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed IFP. I. Screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) A complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), is subject to a mandatory and sua sponte review by the Court. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court must dismiss the complaint if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.