Perez

Perez v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20203:20-cv-01030California1,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO PEREZ, Case No.: 20-cv-1030-BAS-BLM 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUESTS FOR v. PROTECTIVE ORDER, TOLLING AND TO STAY AND ABEY MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, FEDERAL PROCESS 14 Respondent. [ECF No. 1] 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a document using the initial page of this district’s § 2254 habeas corpus petition form entitled “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Protective Order Stay and Abey,” and further captioned in part as “Protective Petition Request to Stay and Abey the Federal Habeas Judicial Process Until State Remedies are Fully Exhausted.” (ECF No. 1 at 1–2.) Petitioner requests “For this court to grant this protective order For the issue of equitable tolling” to allow Petitioner to present his claims in a federal habeas petition for the Court’s consideration “once Petitioner has exhausted his remedies in the lower state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.