Kanzie
Kanzie v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH KANZIE, an individual, Case No. 3:19-cv-02170-AJB-BGS
Plaintiff, ORDER ON DISCOVERY
DISPUTE REGARDING ROG
v.
AT&T MOBILITY SERICES, LLC, a [ECF 19] Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
Defendants.
17 I. INTRODUCTION The Court ordered the parties to submit a Joint Statement addressing their disputes as to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 16 (hereinafter “ROG 16”). The Parties were to address the relevancy of the requested discovery and proportionality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b). On May 21, 2020 the parties filed their Joint Statement for Discovery Dispute regarding Plaintiff’s ROG 16. (Doc. 19.) The Court will address the parties’ positions as relevant to the Court’s analysis of the dispute. II. LEGAL STANDARD “An interrogatory may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2). “Each interrogatory must, to the extent it is not…