Esteghalian

Esteghalian v. Department of the Navy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20203:19-cv-01808California2,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANIJEH ESTEGHLALIAN, Case No.: 19-cv-01808-AJB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; EDCO

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES,

AMEND, (Doc. No. 1); AND Defendants. 16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT, (Doc. No. 2)

19 On September 19, 2019, Plaintiff Manijeh Esteghlalian (“Plaintiff”), a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this action against Defendants Department of the Navy (“the Navy”) and EDCO Waste and Recycling Services “(EDCO”). (Doc. No. 1.) On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff also moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. No. 2.) For the following reasons, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, and DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s IFP motion. // // I. SCREENING UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A) Under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.