Ewing

Ewing v. Hurricane Tax, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20203:19-cv-02328California673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON EWING, Case No.: 19-CV-2328 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HURRICANE TAX, LLC, a California

CRAWFORD’S ORDER

limited liability company; DEEPAK 15 SADASHIV PARWATIKAR, an (ECF No. 33) individual, Defendants. 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Anton Ewing’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Crawford’s June 3, 2020 Order Striking Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice. (“Objections,” ECF No. 33). Having considered Plaintiff’s arguments and the law, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections. District courts “must consider timely objections” to a magistrate’s ruling and “set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also Grimes v. City and Cty. of S.F., 951 F.2d 236, 241 (9th Cir. 1991). A ruling is clearly erroneous only if the reviewing court, on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.