Hastie-Sanders

Hastie-Sanders v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20203:20-cv-00910California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANDON WILLIAM HASTIE- Case No.: 20-cv-0910-BGS

SANDERS,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of [ECF No. 2] Social Security,

16 Defendant.

18 On May 15, 2020, Plaintiff LANDON WILLIAM HASTIE-SANDERS filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the civil filing fee required to commence this action. Before this Court is a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) filed by Plaintiff. (ECF No. 2.) All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (requiring a party instituting a civil action to pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.