Harrington

~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} STEVE HARRINGTON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1824-LAB-RBM Pettonet;| ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 || V. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 || PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, || Respondent. [Doc. 11] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Steve Harrington (“Petitioner”), a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 || pauperis on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”), filed a “Request for ||Extension of Time to Amend and Appointment of Counsel.” (Doc. at 7-8.) Petitioner |jincluded this request within his Opposition to Respondent Patrick Covello’s ||(“Respondent”) Motion to Dismiss the Petition. (/d. at 1-6.) Combining an opposition brief and a motion within the same filing violates Civil Local Rule 5.1(m). See □□□□□□ |/5.1(m) (stating, “[a]ll documents submitted for filing must be filed and captioned …