Hall
Hall v. Marriott International, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD HALL, individually and on behalf Case No.: 19-CV-1715 JLS (AHG) of all others similarly situated,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO v. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Delaware corporation,
16 Defendant. (ECF No. 29)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Todd Hall’s Application for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [D.E. 28] (“Mot.,” ECF No. 29). While it may be appropriate—under certain circumstances, at least, and preferably with leave of the Court—to file notices of supplemental authority, such notices should not be used as an opportunity to supplement the filing party’s arguments. See, e.g., Wi-LAN Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., No. 18-CV-01577-H-BGS, 2019 WL 5681622,…