Hammler

Hammler v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:18-cv-00259California1,345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No.: 18-cv-0259-CAB-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL

DISCOVERY RESPONSES

J. HERNANDEZ, Correctional

Officer, and A. MAGALLANES, 15 Correctional Officer, [ECF No. 65] Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Allen Hammler (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action against Defendants J. Hernandez and A. Magallanes (collectively, “Defendants”) by filing a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 25). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Response, filed on April 24, 2020, nunc pro tunc. (ECF No. 65). For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses. (ECF No. 65). II. LEGAL STANDARD The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.