Hubbard

Hubbard v. Plaza Bonita, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:09-cv-01581California1,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA HUBBARD, Case No.: 09-CV-1581 JLS (JMA)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S

COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ORDER

PLAZA BONITA, LP, et. al.,

AUTHORIZING DEPOSIT PER

Defendants. FRCP 67 AND L.R. 67.1.a.

16 (ECF No. 301)

Presently before the Court is counsel for Defendant Flava Enterprises’ Motion for Order Authorizing Deposit per FRCP 67 and L.R. 67.1.a.1 (“Mot.” ECF. No. 301). The Court vacated the hearing and took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 319. Having carefully reviewed the Motion, counsels’ arguments and evidence, and the relevant law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2009, Plaintiff Barbara Hubbard filed a complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against Plaza Bonita Shopping Center and a majority of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.