Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:17-cv-01436California3,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17cv1436-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE & [ECF No. 292]

ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP;

QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT

YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a federally-recognized Indian tribe; and

DOES 1 THROUGH 100,

18 Defendants.

20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane’s (“W&C”) motion asking this 21 Court to reconsider the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg’s Order (ECF No. 22 284) on April 17, 2020 (“April 17 Order”). ECF No. 292. Quechan Tribe (“Quechan”) 24 25 26 1 The case has since been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher for all further Magistrate Judge proceedings. and Rosette LLP (“Rosette”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. ECF No. 2 311. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for 3 reconsideration. 4 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 6 On March 2, 2018, W&C filed their First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.