Ramirez

Ramirez v. Zimmerman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:17-cv-01230-BAS-AHGCalifornia1,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JAIRO CERVANTES, et al., CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS: 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-1230-BAS-AHG v. Case No. 18-cv-1062-BAS-AHG

SAN DIEGO POLICE CHIEF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN, et al., MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD FOR SUMMARY Defendants. JUDGMENT MOTIONS 13 [ECF No. 163]

BRYAN PEASE,

Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Record on Summary Judgment (“Motion”) with the bodyworn camera (BWC) footage of three officers—totaling 18 videos and nine hours of footage—that “show the entire three-hour span from the time the unlawful assembly was declared . . . to the final arrests . . . from three different angles.” (Mot. at 4, ECF No. 163.) Plaintiffs seek to belatedly supplement the record because, they allege, the City “repeatedly and steadfastly refused to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.