Bouvy

Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20203:19-cv-00881California9,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BOUVY Case No.: 19-cv-881 DMS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

ANALOG DEVICES, INC., a Massachusetts company, as successor to

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION; LINEAR TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware 17 company; LINEAR TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE; and

DOE DEFENDANTS 1–20,

19 Defendants.

21 22 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff Michael 23 Bouvy’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, and 24 Defendants filed a reply. The parties also filed supplemental briefing. For the following 25 reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Plaintiff’s putative class action against Analog Devices, Inc. (“ADI”), Linear Technology Corporation (“LTC”), Linear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.