Shallow

Shallow v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20203:14-cv-00294California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 14CV294-JAH(BLM) LILLIAN SHALLOW, by and through her

Guardian ad Litem, Kathleen Shallow, individually and on behalf of all others SCHEDULING ORDER REGULATING

DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL

similarly situated, PROCEEDINGS Plaintiffs, 14 v.

TARGET CORP. AND LUXOTTICA RETAIL

16 NORTH AMERICA, INC. dba Target Optical, 17 Defendants. 18 On June 19, 2020, the Court held a telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (“ENE”) in the above-entitled action. ECF No. 74. Settlement of the case could not be reached during the ENE and the Court therefore conducted a Case Management Conference pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules. Id. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties shall file a joint motion for a protective order, which includes the terms 25 of their agreement for handling confidential documents and information, on or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.