Bonilla
Bonilla v. U.S. District Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01155-MMA-MSB
CDCR #J-48500,
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY vs. FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 14 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)
U.S. DISTRICT COURT,
Defendant.
18 19 20 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison has filed a civil complaint “Attacking and Challenging the Vexatious Litigant Claim.” See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at 1. Plaintiff contends the U.S. District Court has “ignore[d]” its duty to exercise its subject matter jurisdiction by refusing to void his Alameda County criminal conviction and sentence. Id. at 1‒3. Plaintiff did not file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) together with his Complaint, nor has he paid the initial civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status …