Ramsey

Ramsey v. Zhang-MD

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:20-cv-01076California4,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RAMSEY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01076-AJB-RBB

CDCR #K-99536,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

RONALD ZHANG, M.D.; AND

S. GATES,

Defendants. 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

18 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § § 1915A(b) 20 21 Daniel Ramsey (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, is currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and has filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing, but instead has filed a Prison Trust Fund Account Statement which the Court liberally construes to be a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 3). I. IFP Motion All parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.