Siglin
Siglin v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARKER SIGLIN, individually and on Case No.: 20cv503 DMS (BLM) 11 behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO
Plaintiff,
SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT
v. AND DENYING BOTH PARTIES’ SIXT RENT A CAR, LLC, a Delaware
REQUESTS FOR FEES
limited liability company, Defendant. 16 This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Parker Siglin’s motion to remand to San Diego Superior Court. Defendant Sixt Rent a Car, LLC filed a response in opposition, arguing that the Court should dismiss rather than remand the case. Both parties seek attorney’s fees. After reviewing the parties’ briefs, the record, and the relevant legal authority, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to remand and denies both parties’ requests for fees. I. BACKGROUND In October 2018, Plaintiff (“Plaintiff” or “Siglin”) filed a …