Bray

Bray v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20203:18-cv-01169California1,417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VEGAS BRAY, Case No.: 18-CV-1169 JLS (MBS)

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT J. ESPINOZA, Warden, et al.,

OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND

Respondents. (3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

(ECF Nos. 1, 11)

Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” ECF No. 11), recommending that the Court dismiss Petitioner Vegas Bray’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1). Petitioner did not file any objections to the R&R. Having considered the Petition, Magistrate Judge Berg’s R&R, the state court record, and the law, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Berg’s R&R in its entirety, DENIES the Petition, and DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability (“COA”). BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.