Medeiros
Medeiros v. D' Addezio Kotler
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 19cv1787 JAH (LL)
KIMBERLY MEDEIROS
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
[Doc. No. 2];
MARYANN D’ADDEZIO KOTLER.
16 2. DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT Defendant. COUNSEL [Doc. No. 3]; 18 3. DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) [Doc. No. 1] 20 21 INTRODUCTION On September 17, 2019, Kimberly Medeiros (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking damages against San Diego Superior Court Judge Maryann D’Addezio Kutler (“Defendant”) for violations “of certain protections guaranteed to him by the First, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution.” See Doc. No. 1 at 1. Civil filing fees, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), were not paid at the time of filing. Instead, a…