Keating

Keating v. Jastremski

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20203:15-cv-00057California1,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY L. KEATING ET AL., CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00057-L-AGS

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF

RECORD FOR STEVE DALTON AND

JOHN A. JASTREMSKI ET AL., ARDENT RETIREMENT PLANNING,

LLC; AND (2) BRIEFING SCHEDULE Defendants. (Doc. no. 471)

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.

Pending before the Court in this action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets is an unopposed motion filed by counsel for Counter-Defendants Steve Dalton (“Dalton”) and Ardent Retirement Planning, LLC (“Ardent”) seeking withdrawal from representation. (Doc. no. 471). Two counsel of record are reflected on the docket for Dalton and Ardent. Robert Bursky, an out-of-state attorney who was permitted to appear pro hac vice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.3.c.4 (doc. nos. 384, 385), and Assly Sayyar, who was designated by Mr. Bursky as his local counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.