Schutza

Schutza v. Enniss Family Realty I LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20203:20-cv-00298California1,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT SCHUTZA, Case No.: 20-CV-0298 W (JBL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 9] ENNISS FAMILY REALTY I LLC, A

CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY; ENNIS INC., A

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND

DOES 1-10,

17 Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, arguing that the Court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claim. (Defs.’ Mot. [Doc. 9-1.].) Plaintiff filed its Opposition after the hearing date of May 31, 2020. (Pl.’s Opp’n [Doc. 12].) As a result, Plaintiff’s late-filed Opposition is disregarded. The Court decides the motion on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Scott Schutza, a California resident, is a paraplegic who uses a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.