Mendell

Mendell v. American Medical Response, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:19-cv-01227California2,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MENDELL, individually and Case No.: 19cv1227-BAS(KSC) on behalf of others similarly situated,

ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY v. DISPUTE

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE,

[Doc. No. 50.]

INC.,

16 Defendant.

18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery 19 Dispute. [Doc. No. 50.] In the Joint Motion, plaintiff seeks an order compelling 20 defendant to produce a single document in Excel format that is believed to be responsive 21 to plaintiff’s Document Request No. 1 (“the Excel report”). The Excel report was created 22 by defendant during this litigation at the direction of counsel. Plaintiff claims to have 23 first learned of the existence of the report in a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition on May 28, 2020. 24 [Doc. No. 50, at pp. 2-5, 9.] Defendant has not produced the Excel report, because it 25 believes as follows: (1) the report is not responsive to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.