Reynolds

Reynolds v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20203:19-cv-01358California4,924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEANNA R., Case No.: 19-CV-1358 W (RBB) Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 13 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of (1) ADOPTING JUDGE BROOKS’ 14 Social Security, REPORT AND Defendant. RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 16];

16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [DOC. 13];

(3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [DOC. 14]; AND

21 (4) REMANDING CASE 22 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks recommending that this action be remanded for further proceedings. (R&R [Doc. 16].) For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 13], DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. 14], and REMANDS the case for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND On May 26, 2015, Plaintiff Deanna R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.