Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20203:18-cv-00840California6,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN RE: OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP Case No.: 18CV840 GPC (BGS)

LITIGATION,

ORDER ON NON-PRIVILEGE

. ISSUES AS TO THE STORES’ RFPS

TO TAULER SMITH AND OUTLAW

14 [ECF 224] 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Counter-claimant Roma Mikha and Third-Party Plaintiff NMRM, Inc. and Skyline Market, Inc. (collectively the “Stores”) move to compel Plaintiff Outlaw Laboratory, L.P. (“Outlaw”) and Third-Party Defendant Tauler Smith LLP (“Tauler Smith”) to provide full and complete responses to the Stores’ Request for Production based on non-privilege issues. (ECF 224.) As discussed in more detail below, the Stores’ RFPs to Tauler Smith and Outlaw seek documents related to the following topics: funding for the Outlaw 24 25 26 1 The Court ordered the parties to differentiate between their privilege and non-privilege objections to the RFPs identified in the parties’ June 1, 2020 joint letter briefs. Because the privilege issues are being briefed separately, (ECF 239, 242), this Order does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.