Denman

Denman v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20203:19-cv-02441California688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AHMAD RASHAD DENMAN, Case No. 19cv2441-MMA-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE;

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, [Doc. No. 11] Defendant.

DISMISSING APPEAL WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

18 19 20 On October 30, 2019, Plaintiff Ahmad Rashad Denman, proceeding pro se, filed an action in the small claims division of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, challenging the denial of an application for supplemental security income and social security disability insurance benefits. See Doc. No. 1, Ex. 1. On December 19, 2019, Defendant Andrew Saul, sued in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, appropriately removed the action to this Court. See Doc. No. 1. On February 18, 2020, Defendant answered Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.