Park

Park v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20203:20-cv-00242California4,344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 TIMOTHY JUNYOUNG PARK, Case No. 20-cv-00242-BAS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND (ECF No. 5)

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH

AMERICA, LLC,

17 Defendant.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Timothy Junyoung Park’s Motion to Remand this action to state court. (ECF No. 5.) On February 7, 2020, Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (“JLRNA”) removed this matter to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff contests removal arguing that this case fails to meet the minimum amount in controversy to satisfy diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Mot. to Remand 1:26–28.) The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court finds removal was appropriate and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.