Macias

Macias v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20203:20-cv-01021California1,557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL M., Case No.: 3:20-cv-1021-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, and

SECURITY,

15 (2) DENYING WITHOUT Defendant. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

18 [ECF No. 2]

27 28 Plaintiff Daniel M. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against the Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s final administrative decision denying his application for Social Security Supplemental Security Income Disability Benefits for lack of disability. ECF No. 1. Along with his Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, if amended within 28 days of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.