Padilla

Padilla v. Arredondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:20-cv-00828California2,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON PADILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00828-WQH-RBM

CDCR #K-33879,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR vs. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM 14 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

& 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

L. ARREDONDO, Lieutenant Hearing

16 Officer; P. COVELLO, Former Warden at RJDCF; S.K. HEMENWAY, Final Appeals Examiner, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 I. Procedural History On April 30, 2020, Ramon Padilla (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). 28 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). On May 21, 2020, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.